Scarface was directed by Brian De Palma and written by Oliver Stone. Scareface deals with many social issues of the time in politics and the war on drugs. The film sheds light on corruption and the brutality with in organized crime and governments.
Scarface deals with many social issues that were happening in the 1980's. Our book made it clear that in order for a film to be a success it has to reflect and illustrate to social issues that is currently going on in society. Scareface had showed how the Cuban and United States relations was a bit rocky. Fidel Castro allowed Cubans to come to the United States but he also shipped a bunch of criminals to the United States as well. The tention between the two governments was felt while watching the beginning of the movie. Scarface is full of corruption and that is how Tony Montana made it onto the streets of Miami. Tony killed a former aide to Castro in exchange for a green card. Scarface shows the viewers that governments themselves are corrupt at times.
Cocaine and the war on drugs was also a very big social issue in the 1980's and still is today. I feel that as long as there is a problem with drugs then Scarface will be relevant. Scarface dealt more with the way the drug organizations work rather then running from the law. I found it a bit of different angle then most gangster films. The drug problem is still a social issue that we have today and I am not sure what the answer is to stop the problem. I think movies like Scarface make the problem more well known to those who do not realize that there is such a problem in todays society and that of decades ago.
Scarface like many other ganster movies portrayed Tony Montana as a tough and brutal character. Tony did have a compassionate side to him as well and that compassionate side was in a way the reason for his demise. Tony killed the assassin that was going to kill an innocent wife and children of the man they were targeting to kill because he was reporting on the drug problem. Tony Montana was in no way a good guy but Tony did his business with structure and rules.
Tony Montana eventually met his end after he self destructed. I feel that the things that got Tony to where he was were no longer present in him at the end of the film. Tony was an honest guy and he told it how he saw it. Tony crossed some lines and took a few to many as well and that led to his demise. Scarface goes on to show society that people who live this lifestyle and go down that road will eventually meet there end sooner rather then later. Greed was a large driver of Tony and a large driver for most if not all of those who are involved in organized crime. Greed is a deadly sin and Scarface shows the viewer the ill effects that comes with Greed.
I found Scarface to be a very good movie in my opion but I am one who enjoys the gangser/mafia sytle of movies. Scarface had your usual characteristics of a gangster film but it also had a higher lever of intenational politcal issues involved as well. I found that Scarface dealt with a lot of social issues that are still around today. The big picture shows the corruption and social injustice that is happening. Scarface also went into good detail about the lifestyle of the individuals lived and how those people were very unethical and did not have the best morals. I think Scarface will be a popular movie for many years to come because it has a lot of social issues that society still deals with today.
Friday, July 9, 2010
Thursday, July 8, 2010
The Cider House Rules
The Cider House Rules was directed by Lasse Hallstrom and written by John Irving. The Cider House Rules had a lot of deep social and real life implications that came in to play through out the film. Homer, who was an orphan, was taught by Dr. Larch to perform medical practices and delivering a baby in particular. Homer wanted to explore the world and to see what it had to offer to him and that is what he did when he left St. Cloud, Maine.
I realized with watching The Cider House Rules there were a lot of social issues that were brought up the movie. I noticed the grey area of abortion was brought center stage very often through out the movie. The Cider House Rules also shred some issues of suicide, love, and the behavior of people in general. Reading the chapter with in the book I came across a very simple but yet important pillar in making a film. The Chapter went on to say that the more closely the social aspects relate to the audience, then the more successful the film will more then likely be. I feel that The Cider House Rules hit home with a lot of viewers, including me. A great example of this would be abortion. Homer was a very skilled surgeon but he did not feel that abortion was a practice that should be done, but his mentor and teacher Dr. Larch performed these abortions on a regular basis. Dr. Larch had no problem with performing abortions and said that he was just doing what the patient asked of him to do, even though it was illegal. Homer argued that abortions were wrong and that he would not do them. I feel that society today is still doing the same thing as Dr. Larch and Homer. On one side there are those who see nothing wrong with abortion, and on the other side there are those who think abortion is a horrific thing to do. Abortion is one of those issues in life that is a grey area and there will never be a super majority of people, in my opionion, that agree the same way. Later on in the movie Homer does perform an abortion but it was to help Rose who was expecting her father's baby. Homer realized that there may be certain instances in which an abortion may be performed. Once again this is an issue that many people may be for, against, or teeter either way depending on the certain circumstance at hand. Abortion has many deep underlying issues and effects other then the obvious termination of life.
I feel that there was a connection of The Cider House Rules and the beginning of the baby boomers. I personally believe that it was this time period that created a large impact on social issues. The issues could be from abortions, orphans, to todays impact on social security. The period from WWII and after was a great leap forward for the United States but it did come with sacrific and hardship. I do not have any numbers or facts but logic tells me that when all of the babies were being made during this period there was more then likely an increase in orphans and abortions as well. Society may have changed in certain ways but I feel that our grandparents made the same choices good or bad as we do today. Today's society is probably a lot more open about issues but behind closed doors I think some things never change.
The Cider House Rules in a way challenges society as a whole. Dr. Larch did not have the highest viewing of the world and those in it. On the other hand Homer believed there was a lot more right then wrong. Homer went out and explored life to see what he could find. Homer's travels did give him a taste of hardship, unjust behavior, and heartbreak, but Homer also found who he was and the goodness in people around him.
I found The Cider House Rules was a good movie to watch. To be honest the first ten minutes I thought that it was going to be horrible but my opinion radically changed. I feel the one thing that made The Cider House Rules a good movies was the underlying social, moral, and ethical issues that the movie presented. There was a good plot but the plot was made by the issues. The Cider House Rules was not necessarily a movie about social problems, but a movie about social issues. I feel that The Cider House Rules could pertain to almost anyone because almost everyone has an opinion about the issues that were brought forth. I guess if nothing else when life gives you apples find the best part about it and make cider.
I realized with watching The Cider House Rules there were a lot of social issues that were brought up the movie. I noticed the grey area of abortion was brought center stage very often through out the movie. The Cider House Rules also shred some issues of suicide, love, and the behavior of people in general. Reading the chapter with in the book I came across a very simple but yet important pillar in making a film. The Chapter went on to say that the more closely the social aspects relate to the audience, then the more successful the film will more then likely be. I feel that The Cider House Rules hit home with a lot of viewers, including me. A great example of this would be abortion. Homer was a very skilled surgeon but he did not feel that abortion was a practice that should be done, but his mentor and teacher Dr. Larch performed these abortions on a regular basis. Dr. Larch had no problem with performing abortions and said that he was just doing what the patient asked of him to do, even though it was illegal. Homer argued that abortions were wrong and that he would not do them. I feel that society today is still doing the same thing as Dr. Larch and Homer. On one side there are those who see nothing wrong with abortion, and on the other side there are those who think abortion is a horrific thing to do. Abortion is one of those issues in life that is a grey area and there will never be a super majority of people, in my opionion, that agree the same way. Later on in the movie Homer does perform an abortion but it was to help Rose who was expecting her father's baby. Homer realized that there may be certain instances in which an abortion may be performed. Once again this is an issue that many people may be for, against, or teeter either way depending on the certain circumstance at hand. Abortion has many deep underlying issues and effects other then the obvious termination of life.
I feel that there was a connection of The Cider House Rules and the beginning of the baby boomers. I personally believe that it was this time period that created a large impact on social issues. The issues could be from abortions, orphans, to todays impact on social security. The period from WWII and after was a great leap forward for the United States but it did come with sacrific and hardship. I do not have any numbers or facts but logic tells me that when all of the babies were being made during this period there was more then likely an increase in orphans and abortions as well. Society may have changed in certain ways but I feel that our grandparents made the same choices good or bad as we do today. Today's society is probably a lot more open about issues but behind closed doors I think some things never change.
The Cider House Rules in a way challenges society as a whole. Dr. Larch did not have the highest viewing of the world and those in it. On the other hand Homer believed there was a lot more right then wrong. Homer went out and explored life to see what he could find. Homer's travels did give him a taste of hardship, unjust behavior, and heartbreak, but Homer also found who he was and the goodness in people around him.
I found The Cider House Rules was a good movie to watch. To be honest the first ten minutes I thought that it was going to be horrible but my opinion radically changed. I feel the one thing that made The Cider House Rules a good movies was the underlying social, moral, and ethical issues that the movie presented. There was a good plot but the plot was made by the issues. The Cider House Rules was not necessarily a movie about social problems, but a movie about social issues. I feel that The Cider House Rules could pertain to almost anyone because almost everyone has an opinion about the issues that were brought forth. I guess if nothing else when life gives you apples find the best part about it and make cider.
Monday, July 5, 2010
Rain Man
Rain Man was directed by Barry Levinson and written by Barry Marrow. Rain Man has an intriguing plot of Charlie and Raymond Babbit traveling across the country. Charlie basically kidnapped ramond after he found out that their father had left his fortune to Raymond, who was a savant. Rain Man also had a great deal of acting to go along with the plot.
I thought that Rain Man had an exciting plot and one that could realistically happen. I found Charlie to be a very selfish and egotistical individual at the beginning of the movie. Charlie had a falling out with his father, while he was still in high school, all over a car. Charlie left home never to return until the day of his fathers funeral. I found this very selfish and self centered of Charlie and it will help predict his future actions throughout most of the movie. Charlie is even more enraged when he finds out that he is not the beneficiary to his fathers fortune. Charlie finds out that he has a brother, Raymond, who is the beneficiary of the fortune. Raymond is a savant and has no real concept of money, but Raymond is very high functioning and he is a genius with numbers. Charlie takes Raymond just for the fact that he wants to get custody so he can have access to the family wealth. Raymond and Charlie eventually get to connect and Charlie then realizes that he wants Raymond as a brother, not just as a meal ticket. I think that this plot gives the viewer a deeper connection to the ones around them. Rain Man connects people on domestic and social issues. According to Klein, Rain Man struck a cord by connecting deeply with the emotional life of its audience. I feel that it was this deep connection and the acting that made Rain Man what it is as a movie.
The Acting in Rain Man was very well done. I feel that Dustin Hoffman did an excellent job in portraying Raymond, who is a savant. Hoffman had to use an impersonating style of acting while playing the part of Raymond. Hoffman has the talent to transform himself in to a savant, which he is not. Raymond was the character that made Rain Man what it was. I think that that viewer really connected to Raymond and truely loved the character. Hoffman has the rare talent of avoiding the typecasting trap. Typecasting, as the chapter concludes, is when an actor or actress do similar roles in movies because they have previously proven their ability to do those roles. Hoffman and a few others have the ability to play several different roles and play them to a high degree of excellence. I know there are some actors or actresses that you just can't see playing certain roles and their are certain actors or actresses that you can only see playing certain roles.
This was the first time that I have ever watched Rain Man but I know a lot of people that have seen the movie before and I think that it is a classic. I feel that the messege the movie gets across to the viewer and society is one that will be around for ages. A movie moves in to the classic zone when it can connect people of different backgrounds and different time periods together. I was born in the same year that this movie came out and there are a lot of movies in this time period that I would not care to watch. Rain Man was a good watch for those in the late eighties, for me, and those to come after me.
Reference:
MATHEW J. KLEIN. (1989, April 16). FILM; Psychiatry Looks At the Appeal Of 'Rain Man'. New York Times, p. 24
I thought that Rain Man had an exciting plot and one that could realistically happen. I found Charlie to be a very selfish and egotistical individual at the beginning of the movie. Charlie had a falling out with his father, while he was still in high school, all over a car. Charlie left home never to return until the day of his fathers funeral. I found this very selfish and self centered of Charlie and it will help predict his future actions throughout most of the movie. Charlie is even more enraged when he finds out that he is not the beneficiary to his fathers fortune. Charlie finds out that he has a brother, Raymond, who is the beneficiary of the fortune. Raymond is a savant and has no real concept of money, but Raymond is very high functioning and he is a genius with numbers. Charlie takes Raymond just for the fact that he wants to get custody so he can have access to the family wealth. Raymond and Charlie eventually get to connect and Charlie then realizes that he wants Raymond as a brother, not just as a meal ticket. I think that this plot gives the viewer a deeper connection to the ones around them. Rain Man connects people on domestic and social issues. According to Klein, Rain Man struck a cord by connecting deeply with the emotional life of its audience. I feel that it was this deep connection and the acting that made Rain Man what it is as a movie.
The Acting in Rain Man was very well done. I feel that Dustin Hoffman did an excellent job in portraying Raymond, who is a savant. Hoffman had to use an impersonating style of acting while playing the part of Raymond. Hoffman has the talent to transform himself in to a savant, which he is not. Raymond was the character that made Rain Man what it was. I think that that viewer really connected to Raymond and truely loved the character. Hoffman has the rare talent of avoiding the typecasting trap. Typecasting, as the chapter concludes, is when an actor or actress do similar roles in movies because they have previously proven their ability to do those roles. Hoffman and a few others have the ability to play several different roles and play them to a high degree of excellence. I know there are some actors or actresses that you just can't see playing certain roles and their are certain actors or actresses that you can only see playing certain roles.
This was the first time that I have ever watched Rain Man but I know a lot of people that have seen the movie before and I think that it is a classic. I feel that the messege the movie gets across to the viewer and society is one that will be around for ages. A movie moves in to the classic zone when it can connect people of different backgrounds and different time periods together. I was born in the same year that this movie came out and there are a lot of movies in this time period that I would not care to watch. Rain Man was a good watch for those in the late eighties, for me, and those to come after me.
Reference:
MATHEW J. KLEIN. (1989, April 16). FILM; Psychiatry Looks At the Appeal Of 'Rain Man'. New York Times, p. 24
Friday, July 2, 2010
The Dark Knight
The Dark Knight was written by Christopher Nolan and Jonathon Nolan and directed by Christopher Nolan. The Dark Knight has a good plot of good versus evil that and has a great cast of actors and actresses. Gotham is the battle ground of good versus evil and Gotham is looking for their hero to depend on.
I realized while watching The Dark Knight that there was a lot of symbolism and irony throughout the movie. An example of this would be Harvey Dent's two faced coin which I feel had a lot of irony and symbolism. Dent was once called two face before he became the DA and Gotham's "White Knight", which Dent was then dubbed. Dent found himself in a rage towards the end of the movie when he lost his wife to be and burned half his face. Dent's coin was also burned on one side, which signified how Dent from there on did not make his own luck, but was in a rage of chances. The title The Dark Knight it self has a lot of meaning to it. The "Dark Knight" could be Batman, or it could also imply how Dent turned from the "White Knight" to the "Dark Knight". I also found it Ironic that Dent turned himself in for being Batman when he was not. Dent, with this move, ran the risk of political and social ruin. Once Dent had turned evil and was dead Batman took the fall for Dent's actions to keep the city with their hopes held high of future prevention of crime. Batman by doing this also ran a huge risk of not only hurting Batman, but Bruce Wayne.
The Dark Knight has a great deal of acting with in the film. Heath Ledger, as the Joker, played one of the most memorable parts that I have seen. The Joker was a violent and destructive character that had a mission of creating chaos. Ledger to me had to play the part of an impersonating actor during The Dark Knight. The chapter teaches us that actors that are impersonators have the talent to leave their real personality behind and become the character they are playing. I thought that the Ledger played a very sick and sadistic role as the Joker. I feel that people were drawn in to the Joker because of how crazy he was. I found it a great deal of acting to be able to hold a knife to someones face, which the Joker did often, and be able to laugh about it all. Ledger became a crazed lunatic with a very twisted side. There was a scene when the Joker was filming a victim and was laughing, but then screamed look at me in a very deep and dark voice. That scene sent shivers down the audience's back. According to New Statesman, Ledgers performance amounts to an aria of enigmatic menace. Ledger, to me, proved that he was a great actor and able to impersonate a character to the fullest. I also was in awe during the scene when the Joker was getting beat in the jail cell and all the Joker did was laugh. The scene was as if the Joker loved pain and torment. I think this scene showed the viewer that this guy is a nut job.
Many people go to movies to see the actors or actresses in the movies rather then the plot of the actual story. I believe that this is what made The Dark Knight a hit movie. I think that it was a good plot also but I think that Heath Ledger and his acting was what made The Dark Knight was it is today. I believe that The Dark Knight connected to the masses in much different ways that previous Bat Man movies have done and I am saying that from a personal stand point as well. I have never really been into the Bat Man movies or any of those kinds of movies. I will also say that I have seen The Dark Knight several times and know others that have seen the movie several times. The Dark Knight set itself apart from the others because of the acting with in the movie along with a good plot.
References:
(2008). Dark was the knight, cold was the clown. New Statesman, 137(4897), 37.
I realized while watching The Dark Knight that there was a lot of symbolism and irony throughout the movie. An example of this would be Harvey Dent's two faced coin which I feel had a lot of irony and symbolism. Dent was once called two face before he became the DA and Gotham's "White Knight", which Dent was then dubbed. Dent found himself in a rage towards the end of the movie when he lost his wife to be and burned half his face. Dent's coin was also burned on one side, which signified how Dent from there on did not make his own luck, but was in a rage of chances. The title The Dark Knight it self has a lot of meaning to it. The "Dark Knight" could be Batman, or it could also imply how Dent turned from the "White Knight" to the "Dark Knight". I also found it Ironic that Dent turned himself in for being Batman when he was not. Dent, with this move, ran the risk of political and social ruin. Once Dent had turned evil and was dead Batman took the fall for Dent's actions to keep the city with their hopes held high of future prevention of crime. Batman by doing this also ran a huge risk of not only hurting Batman, but Bruce Wayne.
The Dark Knight has a great deal of acting with in the film. Heath Ledger, as the Joker, played one of the most memorable parts that I have seen. The Joker was a violent and destructive character that had a mission of creating chaos. Ledger to me had to play the part of an impersonating actor during The Dark Knight. The chapter teaches us that actors that are impersonators have the talent to leave their real personality behind and become the character they are playing. I thought that the Ledger played a very sick and sadistic role as the Joker. I feel that people were drawn in to the Joker because of how crazy he was. I found it a great deal of acting to be able to hold a knife to someones face, which the Joker did often, and be able to laugh about it all. Ledger became a crazed lunatic with a very twisted side. There was a scene when the Joker was filming a victim and was laughing, but then screamed look at me in a very deep and dark voice. That scene sent shivers down the audience's back. According to New Statesman, Ledgers performance amounts to an aria of enigmatic menace. Ledger, to me, proved that he was a great actor and able to impersonate a character to the fullest. I also was in awe during the scene when the Joker was getting beat in the jail cell and all the Joker did was laugh. The scene was as if the Joker loved pain and torment. I think this scene showed the viewer that this guy is a nut job.
Many people go to movies to see the actors or actresses in the movies rather then the plot of the actual story. I believe that this is what made The Dark Knight a hit movie. I think that it was a good plot also but I think that Heath Ledger and his acting was what made The Dark Knight was it is today. I believe that The Dark Knight connected to the masses in much different ways that previous Bat Man movies have done and I am saying that from a personal stand point as well. I have never really been into the Bat Man movies or any of those kinds of movies. I will also say that I have seen The Dark Knight several times and know others that have seen the movie several times. The Dark Knight set itself apart from the others because of the acting with in the movie along with a good plot.
References:
(2008). Dark was the knight, cold was the clown. New Statesman, 137(4897), 37.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)